The notice went on to state well owner Copper River Basin Regional Housing Authority (CRBRHA) is “actively working to address this issue by exploring options for treatment and remediation.”
I reached out to CRBRHA President/CEO Teri Nutter via email to learn whether these two tests were the only data on PFAS presence in the well water. Are these numbers an increase or decrease from any prior quantities?
According to Nutter, “The DEC received funding to do baseline testing of PFAS/PFOS on public water systems – we participated in the baseline testing and have shared the results with the public and recommended filtration remediation. When we acquired the Tazlina Water Well in 2015, DEC did not require testing for PFAS/PFOS. We do not know when the PFAS/PFOS has been present in the water.”
An MCL is an enforceable legal standard for drinking water. However, exceeding the PFAS MCL will not prompt any immediate changes. According to a fact sheet issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “Systems that detect PFAS above the new standards will have five years to implement solutions that reduce PFAS in their drinking water.”
A wide ranging discussion of this issue occurred within the Copper Valley News and Info Facebook group. Many residents were extremely upset or concerned, but some were not. Filters were widely discussed. The main sentiment seemed to be a desire to know more: What do these numbers really mean for human health and what will happen in the future? The nearest additional water source the public can use, for a fee, is in Kenny Lake.
Prior to the 2024 designation of four ppt as the threshold requiring action on the part of the water provider, there was no federal legal standard. However, the EPA did issue a non binding “lifetime health advisory” (LHA) of 70 ppt for drinking water.
By Alaska state regulation, at levels above 70 ppt, “the responsible party must evaluate the extent of the contamination in the soil and groundwater, determine whether and to what extent drinking water supplies are impacted, provide treatment or alternative water if action levels are exceeded, and begin cleanup with DEC’s oversight.”
Statewide, over 93 communities, including many near airports or firefighting related facilities, have demonstrated drinking water PFAS concentrations above 70 ppt. Some could only be described as contaminated, such as a well in Gustavus showing 11,500 ppt of the chemical PFOS, a member of the PFAS family. Incidentally, the water testing in Gustavus was performed by an Ahtna, Inc. subcontractor.
102 Alaska communities have been shown to have drinking water PFAS levels below 70 ppt. Within that group, some would now be above the relatively new limit of 4 ppt. Others have no detectable PFAS in their water. As of press time, I had not yet reviewed all 102 reports.
This article can’t provide a clear cut answer, but CRR will continue to cover this story as it develops.
The short term recommendation from the US EPA, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), and Canada Health is to use a filter to reduce exposure. Any filters used should be certified by a reputable agency to filter PFAS specifically.
For a summary of research-based information regarding this family of chemicals and human health, along with links to fact sheets and additional study results, visit https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/pfc .
Disclosure: CRBRHA and Ahtna, Inc. are Copper River Record advertisers. This did not influence our coverage of this story.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here